Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Micro-Star Int’L Co. Ltd. holds a company patent portfolio that currently features 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total active workload for the company's intellectual property at the patent office. The prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner, PHAN, HUY Q, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The data confirms that PHAN, HUY Q is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, which is the only matter currently under review.
The portfolio is currently associated with 0 distinct art units, which suggests a unique administrative status for the pending matter. While the art unit is not specified, the assignment of 1 distinct examiner indicates that the case is moving through the examination process. For a practitioner, this means that the relationship with PHAN, HUY Q is the primary factor in the success of the 1 pending office action. There is no diversification across different examiners or art units to mitigate the impact of a single individual's interpretation. The pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current interaction with the patent office, overseen by the distinct examiner despite the 0 distinct art units listed.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAN, HUY Q | 1 | 55.6% | +33.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18535993 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE SMART CHARGING SYSTEM | PHAN, HUY Q | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18535993 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE SMART CHARGING SYSTEM | PHAN, HUY Q | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18535993 | ELECTRIC VEHICLE SMART CHARGING SYSTEM | PHAN, HUY Q | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial