Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Micronvision Corp.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Micronvision Corp. is currently dealing with 6 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners. All 6 pending office actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a tight technical focus for the company's current filings. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's innovations are closely related in subject matter and fall under the jurisdiction of a single examination group.

BOLER, RYNAE E is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 3 pending office actions. The remaining pending office actions are handled by the other 3 distinct examiners assigned to the portfolio. Given that all cases are in 1 distinct art unit, the company's prosecution success in this area is heavily dependent on the interactions with BOLER, RYNAE E and the other distinct examiners within that specific unit. Practitioners should focus on establishing a consistent dialogue within this 1 art unit to streamline the resolution of the 6 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOLER, RYNAE E 3 62.4% +8.8%
HENDERSON, RYAN N 2 63.9% +18.7%
CHOU, WILLIAM B 1 72.7% +20.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17843217 ENDOSCOPIC FLUORESCENCE IMAGING HENDERSON, RYAN N 81d overdue
18628133 ERGONOMIC URETEROSCOPE HAVING SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE PORTIONS HENDERSON, RYAN N —
18374740 HAND-HELD ENDOSCOPIC SYSTEM WITH A SINGLE-USE CANNULA AND A SINGLE-USE ACCESS SHEATH BOLER, RYNAE E —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17843217 ENDOSCOPIC FLUORESCENCE IMAGING HENDERSON, RYAN N 81d overdue
18628133 ERGONOMIC URETEROSCOPE HAVING SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE PORTIONS HENDERSON, RYAN N —
18083209 Compact Robotic Endoscope CHOU, WILLIAM B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3795 6

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18628133 ERGONOMIC URETEROSCOPE HAVING SINGLE-USE AND REUSABLE PORTIONS HENDERSON, RYAN N 3795 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18374740 HAND-HELD ENDOSCOPIC SYSTEM WITH A SINGLE-USE CANNULA AND A SINGLE-USE ACCESS SHEATH BOLER, RYNAE E 3795 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2023
18211486 HAND-HELD, MULTI-BAND IMAGING PEN BOLER, RYNAE E 3795 §103 Final Rejection 104d overdue Pending Jun 19, 2023
18113395 PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY IMAGING BOLER, RYNAE E 3795 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 23, 2023
18083209 Compact Robotic Endoscope CHOU, WILLIAM B 3795 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2022
17843217 ENDOSCOPIC FLUORESCENCE IMAGING HENDERSON, RYAN N 3795 §103§112 Final Rejection 81d overdue Pending Jun 17, 2022

Managing Micronvision Corp.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Micronvision Corp. have?

Micronvision Corp. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Micronvision Corp. applications?

Rynae E Boler has the most, with 3 of Micronvision Corp.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Micronvision Corp.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month