Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Microport Neurotech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ULSH, DUNG T 1 78.3% +17.4%
HARRIS, WESLEY G 1 73.1% +22.1%
HALL, DEANNA K 1 75.8% +15.4%
WILLSE, DAVID H 1 67.5% +13.2%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18267636 MEDICAL CATHETER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR HALL, DEANNA K 66d overdue
18264349 CATHETER REINFORCEMENT LAYER AND CATHETER ULSH, DUNG T 28d overdue
18271935 CONVEYING GUIDE WIRE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR HARRIS, WESLEY G 10d overdue
17617884 VASCULAR IMPLANT, DELIVERY DEVICE AND MEDICAL APPARATUS WILLSE, DAVID H 10d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 3
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18264349 CATHETER REINFORCEMENT LAYER AND CATHETER ULSH, DUNG T 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Aug 04, 2023
18271935 CONVEYING GUIDE WIRE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR HARRIS, WESLEY G 3783 §112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2023
18267636 MEDICAL CATHETER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR HALL, DEANNA K 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Jun 15, 2023
17617884 VASCULAR IMPLANT, DELIVERY DEVICE AND MEDICAL APPARATUS WILLSE, DAVID H 3774 §102 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Dec 09, 2021

Managing Microport Neurotech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month