Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Milian Borisov Arsov maintains a patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The current prosecution activity includes 1 pending office action. This single action indicates a focused interaction with the patent office rather than a filing strategy involving multiple concurrent actions. For the practitioner, this suggests a manageable workload with a clear focus on a specific set of claims.
The organizational footprint of the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Such a concentrated structure suggests that the legal strategy is currently channeled through a specific technical niche. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication path since all active matters are contained within a single administrative unit. This concentration reduces the complexity often associated with navigating multiple art unit standards.
PILLAY, DEVINA serves as the busiest examiner for this entity. This specific examiner is handling the 1 pending office action currently on record. Because the busiest examiner's workload matches the total pending actions, the portfolio's immediate outcomes depend on the interactions with this individual examiner. Understanding this examiner's past patterns will be critical for the success of the pending application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PILLAY, DEVINA | 1 | 44.2% | +25.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18573122 | FLOATING PHOTOVOLTAIC PLATFORM | PILLAY, DEVINA | 11d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18573122 | FLOATING PHOTOVOLTAIC PLATFORM | PILLAY, DEVINA | 1726 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Dec 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial