Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mincle Co. Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mincle Co. Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The current prosecution is handled by a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This concentration suggests a targeted approach to intellectual property within this specific technical field. By focusing on a single art unit, the company can develop a specialized prosecution strategy that accounts for the specific examination standards of that division.

The busiest examiner, GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure accounts for the entirety of the company's pending office actions. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's immediate prosecution strategy is focused on resolving the issues raised by this single examiner. Practitioners should prioritize the specific feedback from GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY, as the resolution of this 1 pending office action is the only current path to securing patent rights for the company in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1 68.3% +52.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253487 WORK MAT FOR SUPPORTING LABORATORY VESSELS GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1798 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18253487 WORK MAT FOR SUPPORTING LABORATORY VESSELS GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1798 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 18, 2023

Managing Mincle Co. Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month