Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ming Young Biomedical Corp. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, RALIS, STEPHEN J, who is responsible for the entirety of the company's active prosecution. The workload is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, showing the administrative path for the company's intellectual property filings.
RALIS, STEPHEN J is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This level of concentration means that the company's legal strategy is tied to the specific examination tendencies of a single individual. There are no other examiners or art units currently involved in the company's pending matters. The focus of the current filings is managed through this single administrative channel.
For a practitioner, this data highlights a prosecution environment with a single point of contact. The outcome of the active office action will define the immediate success of the portfolio. Because only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit are involved, there is no need to navigate varying procedural styles or conflicting interpretations of patent law. The focus remains entirely on the interaction with RALIS, STEPHEN J.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RALIS, STEPHEN J | 1 | 33.5% | +42.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18220018 | PRODUCT, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND POSTURE | RALIS, STEPHEN J | 96d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18220018 | PRODUCT, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND POSTURE | RALIS, STEPHEN J | 96d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3992 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18220018 | PRODUCT, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND POSTURE | RALIS, STEPHEN J | 3992 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 96d overdue | Pending | Jul 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial