Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mitra Future Technologies Inc. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being processed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. The company's current prosecution profile is concentrated in this single active case, which suggests a focused effort to secure patent protection for a specific innovation. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the subject matter falls within a particular technical domain of the Chemistry & Materials field.
PILLAY, DEVINA is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. This figure matches the total of 1 pending office actions for the portfolio. For the practitioner, this means that the current prosecution strategy is entirely focused on the feedback from this single examiner and the specific environment of the 1 distinct art unit. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1, the applicant does not have to manage multiple examiner relationships or varying art unit requirements. Instead, the focus remains on resolving the active matter by addressing the specific technical and legal issues raised by PILLAY, DEVINA during the examination process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PILLAY, DEVINA | 1 | 44.2% | +25.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18344749 | MIXED SiO4 AND PO4 SYSTEM FOR FABRICATING HIGH-CAPACITY CATHODES | PILLAY, DEVINA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18344749 | MIXED SiO4 AND PO4 SYSTEM FOR FABRICATING HIGH-CAPACITY CATHODES | PILLAY, DEVINA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18344749 | MIXED SiO4 AND PO4 SYSTEM FOR FABRICATING HIGH-CAPACITY CATHODES | PILLAY, DEVINA | 1726 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial