Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mitralix Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ORKIN, ALEXANDER J, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company's current patent office activity is entirely focused on this single examiner's review. The 1 pending office action represents the total active volume for the company.
This concentration in 1 distinct art unit and under 1 distinct examiner indicates a singular point of focus for the company's current medical device strategy. Practitioners should note that the 1 distinct examiner will be the sole arbiter of the company's current claims. This centralized approach means that the company's success in the medical device sector depends on the perspective of ORKIN, ALEXANDER J. Having only 1 distinct art unit involved simplifies the administrative burden but increases the importance of this single prosecution thread. The 1 busiest examiner pending action is synonymous with the total pending workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORKIN, ALEXANDER J | 1 | 65.4% | +26.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19024420 | Heart Valve Repair Devices for Placement in Ventricle and Delivery Systems for Implanting Heart Valve Repair Devices | ORKIN, ALEXANDER J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3771 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19024420 | Heart Valve Repair Devices for Placement in Ventricle and Delivery Systems for Implanting Heart Valve Repair Devices | ORKIN, ALEXANDER J | 3771 | §102DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMitralix Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Alexander J Orkin has the most, with 1 of Mitralix Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
