2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Mixhalo Corp. has 2 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, with WOO, STELLA L identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for this portfolio. With 2 distinct examiners handling the 2 pending office actions, the prosecution is split between two different individual reviewers. This means the applicant must manage two separate relationships at the patent office. Since WOO, STELLA L is one of the 2 distinct examiners, the practitioner should prepare for two potentially different examination styles for the pending matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOO, STELLA L | 1 | 79.7% | +13.3% |
| MILLS, DONALD L | 1 | 84.6% | +10.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18811984 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT DUPLICATION AND TRANSMISSION OF LIVE AUDIO DATA | MILLS, DONALD L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18961826 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AI-GUIDED LIVE EVENT AUDIO MIXING | WOO, STELLA L | — |
| 18811984 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT DUPLICATION AND TRANSMISSION OF LIVE AUDIO DATA | MILLS, DONALD L | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18961826 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AI-GUIDED LIVE EVENT AUDIO MIXING | WOO, STELLA L | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 18811984 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT DUPLICATION AND TRANSMISSION OF LIVE AUDIO DATA | MILLS, DONALD L | — | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial