Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mizuho Osi has 1 pending office action within its patent portfolio, which is categorized under Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and is located in 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular point of contact for the company's current patent applications. For a practitioner, this means that the immediate success of the portfolio is tied to the outcome of this 1 pending office action.
THROOP, MYLES A is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action constitutes the total pending office actions for the company. The alignment of these figures shows that all current prosecution efforts are focused on the desk of THROOP, MYLES A. Practitioners should tailor their response strategy to the specific technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit and the individual preferences of the assigned examiner to ensure the application advances toward allowance.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| THROOP, MYLES A | 1 | 58.5% | +40.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18394589 | SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING AND/OR POSITIONING A PATIENT BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER A MEDICAL PROCEDURE | THROOP, MYLES A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18394589 | SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING AND/OR POSITIONING A PATIENT BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER A MEDICAL PROCEDURE | THROOP, MYLES A | 3679 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial