Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mjp Innovations Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, showing that the company's mechanical designs are being reviewed in two different specialized groups. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, providing different perspectives on the company's patent applications.
JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 2 pending office actions. Since there are 3 pending office actions in total, this examiner is responsible for the majority of the active workload. The remaining pending office action is handled by the other distinct examiner. This concentration with one examiner managing most of the cases means the applicant's success is heavily influenced by this individual's review.
For a practitioner, the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering focus requires adapting to the specific requirements of the 2 distinct art units. The 2 pending office actions under the busiest examiner represent a significant portion of the active workload. Because the cases are spread across multiple examiners, the legal team should be prepared for different technical standards and examiner expectations. Success for Mjp Innovations Inc. depends on effectively managing these separate prosecution tracks while addressing the concentration of cases with the busiest examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 2 | 63.9% | +29.9% |
| BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT | 1 | 70.1% | +24.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18208401 | FEMORAL NECK SUPPORT STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 44d overdue |
| 18208417 | BONE FRACTURE REPAIR STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 44d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18208401 | FEMORAL NECK SUPPORT STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 44d overdue |
| 18208417 | BONE FRACTURE REPAIR STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 44d overdue |
| 16921954 | FEMORAL NECK SUPPORT STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3773 | 2 |
| 3775 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18208401 | FEMORAL NECK SUPPORT STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 3773 | §101§102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 44d overdue | Pending | Jun 12, 2023 |
| 18208417 | BONE FRACTURE REPAIR STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T | 3773 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 44d overdue | Pending | Jun 12, 2023 |
| 16921954 | FEMORAL NECK SUPPORT STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USE | BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT | 3775 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 07, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMjp Innovations Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jacqueline T Johanas has the most, with 2 of Mjp Innovations Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
