Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mls Acq Inc. D/B/A Max Analytical Technologies has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This indicates a focused approach to securing intellectual property in this specific technology sector. The concentration in a single art unit suggests that the company's analytical innovations are being reviewed by a specialized group with consistent examination standards.
The busiest examiner, ALABI, OYELEYE A, is responsible for the pending office action. Since this is the only active case, the examiner's specific review is the primary factor in the current prosecution. Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the preferences of this official within the art unit. This centralized environment allows for a direct dialogue with the patent office, as there are no other active examiners or art units to coordinate with at this time, ensuring a streamlined prosecution process for the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALABI, OYELEYE A | 1 | 83.9% | +23.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18763537 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING INTERFERENCE SPECTRA FOR LOW DETECTION LIMITS USING REACTOR | ALABI, OYELEYE A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18763537 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING INTERFERENCE SPECTRA FOR LOW DETECTION LIMITS USING REACTOR | ALABI, OYELEYE A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18763537 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING INTERFERENCE SPECTRA FOR LOW DETECTION LIMITS USING REACTOR | ALABI, OYELEYE A | 1797 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMls Acq Inc. D/B/A Max Analytical Technologies has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Oyeleye A Alabi has the most, with 1 of Mls Acq Inc. D/B/A Max Analytical Technologies's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
