Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Mobiltech currently faces 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution suggests that the company's current patent applications cover different subjects that fall under different administrative jurisdictions at the USPTO. The presence of 2 distinct art units means that the company must navigate different sets of internal guidelines and technical expertise.
OCHSNER, ISABELLA PAIGE is the busiest examiner for Mobiltech, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is divided equally among the 2 distinct examiners. This distribution of actions to examiners indicates that no single examiner is handling a bulk of the portfolio. Practitioners should note that with 2 distinct art units involved, the prosecution strategy may need to be tailored to the specific standards of each unit despite the small number of total actions. The 2 pending office actions represent the entirety of the company's current pending workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCHSNER, ISABELLA PAIGE | 1 | — | — |
| FITCH, GRANT FREDERICK | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18491298 | METHOD FOR LIGHT WEIGHTING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON RECORD-MEDIUM FOR EXECUTING METHOD THEREFOR | FITCH, GRANT FREDERICK | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2618 | 1 |
| 2124 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18746436 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING VIRTUAL REALITY SPACE BASED ON DIGITAL TWIN, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON RECORDING MEDIUM FOR EXECUTING METHOD THEREFOR | OCHSNER, ISABELLA PAIGE | 2618 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 18, 2024 |
| 18491298 | METHOD FOR LIGHT WEIGHTING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM RECORDED ON RECORD-MEDIUM FOR EXECUTING METHOD THEREFOR | FITCH, GRANT FREDERICK | 2124 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial