Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Moment AI Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a focused prosecution effort for a specific communication-related innovation within the USPTO, where the applicant can concentrate on the technical requirements of a single specialized unit.
BARAKAT, MOHAMED is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding the 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is dependent on the specific feedback from this single examiner. This concentration simplifies the prosecution task but places importance on the outcome of this individual office action. For the applicant, success in the communications field hinges on effectively addressing the concerns of this 1 distinct examiner to move the 1 pending office action toward a final disposition within the assigned art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARAKAT, MOHAMED | 1 | 73.7% | +23.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18789981 | FACIAL RECOGNITION AND MONITORING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD | BARAKAT, MOHAMED | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2689 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18789981 | FACIAL RECOGNITION AND MONITORING DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD | BARAKAT, MOHAMED | 2689 | DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial