Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Momenta (Suzhou) Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The data shows that there are 0 distinct art units associated with the current pending workload, which is an unusual administrative status for active prosecution. Practitioners should investigate the specific procedural standing of this application to understand the lack of a recorded art unit. The presence of 1 distinct examiner indicates that a single individual is responsible for the review process.
The busiest examiner for the company is HOCKER, JOHN PAUL, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This single matter represents the total active workload for the portfolio. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the prosecution is concentrated under a single individual. This centralized structure allows for direct communication with the examiner but lacks the broader context of art unit trends. The workload of 1 busiest examiner pending 1 matter reflects a very limited volume of current activity at the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOCKER, JOHN PAUL | 1 | 56.4% | +29.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18358169 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONSTRUCTING VEHICLE DYNAMICS MODEL AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTING VEHICLE STATE INFORMATION | HOCKER, JOHN PAUL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18358169 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONSTRUCTING VEHICLE DYNAMICS MODEL AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTING VEHICLE STATE INFORMATION | HOCKER, JOHN PAUL | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18358169 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONSTRUCTING VEHICLE DYNAMICS MODEL AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTING VEHICLE STATE INFORMATION | HOCKER, JOHN PAUL | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial