Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mosquito Squad Franchising Spe LLC has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company's current prosecution is concentrated with a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's immediate patenting efforts are focused on a specific technological niche or a single patent application. This centralized approach means that the company's current patent office presence is very narrow.
The busiest examiner for the company is PAK, JOHN D, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This single action constitutes the total pending workload for the entire portfolio. Consequently, the company's current success in the patent office is tied to the review process of this one examiner. Legal strategy can be highly specialized, focusing on the precedents and preferences of this examiner and the distinct art unit, as the outcome of this single matter will define the company's current prosecution success.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAK, JOHN D | 1 | 52.4% | +37.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18487012 | BOTANICAL PESTICIDE COMPOSITIONS | PAK, JOHN D | 24d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18487012 | BOTANICAL PESTICIDE COMPOSITIONS | PAK, JOHN D | 24d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18487012 | BOTANICAL PESTICIDE COMPOSITIONS | PAK, JOHN D | 1699 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 24d overdue | Pending | Oct 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial