Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Motivation Studio Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Motivation Studio Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, DEODHAR, OMKAR A, within 1 distinct art unit. DEODHAR, OMKAR A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action.

The company's prosecution is currently centered on a single application. The use of 1 distinct art unit indicates a specific focus within the medical device field. With only 1 pending office action, the applicant can dedicate full attention to the specific feedback provided by the examiner.

The alignment of the technology area with the specific art unit suggests that the application is being reviewed by a specialist in medical devices. This allows for a concentrated effort to resolve the pending matter. The limited number of pending actions suggests a highly manageable prosecution pipeline at this stage. This focus ensures that the applicant can provide a comprehensive and detailed response to the examiner's findings.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DEODHAR, OMKAR A 1 80.2% +19.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18792308 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMERSIVE BLENDING OF REAL-LIFE ACTIVITIES WITH GAMING DEODHAR, OMKAR A —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18792308 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMERSIVE BLENDING OF REAL-LIFE ACTIVITIES WITH GAMING DEODHAR, OMKAR A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18792308 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMMERSIVE BLENDING OF REAL-LIFE ACTIVITIES WITH GAMING DEODHAR, OMKAR A 3715 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 01, 2024

Managing Motivation Studio Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month