Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Motive Medical Intelligence is currently engaged in patent prosecution within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio shows 1 pending office action, indicating a very specific and targeted approach to its current intellectual property filings. This 1 pending office action represents the company's current focus at the patent office.
The prosecution is highly centralized, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current patent work is confined to a specific technical niche within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. HOLCOMB, MARK is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This means that the entirety of the company's pending patent pipeline is under the review of this specific individual.
For a patent practitioner, the involvement of only 1 distinct art unit simplifies the procedural requirements for the portfolio. The 1 busiest examiner pending office action under HOLCOMB, MARK is the sole focus of the current prosecution efforts. The company's immediate success is dependent on the resolution of this 1 matter, making the specific examiner's preferences and the 1 distinct art unit's standards the primary factors in the company's patent strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOLCOMB, MARK | 1 | 33.5% | +40.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18611501 | Artificially Intelligent Systems, Methods and Media for Identification, Quantification and Correction of Defects in Health Care Services | HOLCOMB, MARK | 71d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18611501 | Artificially Intelligent Systems, Methods and Media for Identification, Quantification and Correction of Defects in Health Care Services | HOLCOMB, MARK | 71d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18611501 | Artificially Intelligent Systems, Methods and Media for Identification, Quantification and Correction of Defects in Health Care Services | HOLCOMB, MARK | 3685 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 71d overdue | Pending | Mar 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial