Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Mott Corporation

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LA VILLA, MICHAEL EUGENE 1 75.2% +18.4%
DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 1 61.3% +29.7%
CARPENTER, WILLIAM R 1 54.5% +53.1%
SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS 1 65.2% +39.4%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17886585 DRUG DELIVERY ASSEMBLY FOR EXTENDED DRUG DELIVERY AND TUNABILITY CARPENTER, WILLIAM R 45d overdue
17991066 POROUS FLOW RESTRICTOR AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 7d
18031743 POROUS ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS OF FABRICATION AND USE LA VILLA, MICHAEL EUGENE 22d
17418984 DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS 54d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 2
1784 1
3753 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18031743 POROUS ASSEMBLIES AND RELATED METHODS OF FABRICATION AND USE LA VILLA, MICHAEL EUGENE 1784 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Apr 13, 2023
17991066 POROUS FLOW RESTRICTOR AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF DURDEN, RICHARD KYLE 3753 §102 Final Rejection 7d Pending Nov 21, 2022
17886585 DRUG DELIVERY ASSEMBLY FOR EXTENDED DRUG DELIVERY AND TUNABILITY CARPENTER, WILLIAM R 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Aug 12, 2022
17418984 DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE SWANSON, LEAH JENNINGS 3783 §103 Non-Final OA 54d Pending Jun 28, 2021

Managing Mott Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month