Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Moving Magnet Technologies

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
§102 only2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
3
Semiconductors
60% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REID JR, CHARLES H 1 68.6% +24.0%
STOUT, RILEY OWEN 1 76.0% +0.7%
WILHELM, TIMOTHY 1 78.6% +11.8%
HAILE, BENYAM 1 61.9% +24.7%
JOHNSON, ERIC 1 62.4% +22.0%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17295737 ADJUSTABLE FORCE DEVICE JOHNSON, ERIC 70d overdue
18704397 MOTOR WITH IMPROVED ACOUSTICS REID JR, CHARLES H 44d overdue
18006041 CYCLE DRIVING DEVICE HAVING A TORQUE SENSOR WILHELM, TIMOTHY 5d
17995231 PASSIVE HAPTIC DEVICE HAILE, BENYAM 13d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2834 3
3617 1
2688 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18704397 MOTOR WITH IMPROVED ACOUSTICS REID JR, CHARLES H 2834 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Apr 24, 2024
18570207 SMALL MOTOR STOUT, RILEY OWEN 2834 §102 Non-Final OA 110d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2023
18006041 CYCLE DRIVING DEVICE HAVING A TORQUE SENSOR WILHELM, TIMOTHY 3617 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Jan 19, 2023
17995231 PASSIVE HAPTIC DEVICE HAILE, BENYAM 2688 §103 Non-Final OA 13d Pending Sep 30, 2022
17295737 ADJUSTABLE FORCE DEVICE JOHNSON, ERIC 2834 §102 Final Rejection 70d overdue Pending May 20, 2021

Managing Moving Magnet Technologies's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month