Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Mpeg La L L C

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH 1 28.6% +33.3%
ZARA, JANE J 1 70.8% +16.1%
ALLEN, SARAH ELIZABETH 1 60.9% +45.0%
ANGELL, JON E 1 70.9% +21.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17925807 ORTHOGONALLY LINKED MULTIMERIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES ZARA, JANE J 54d
18032118 LINKER COMPOUNDS COMPRISING AMIDE BONDS KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH
17923843 LINKER COMPOUNDS ALLEN, SARAH ELIZABETH

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17925807 ORTHOGONALLY LINKED MULTIMERIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES ZARA, JANE J 54d
17922254 MULTIMERIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES WITH DIVIDED STRANDS ANGELL, JON E 69d
18032118 LINKER COMPOUNDS COMPRISING AMIDE BONDS KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH
17923843 LINKER COMPOUNDS ALLEN, SARAH ELIZABETH

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1637 3
1658 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18032118 LINKER COMPOUNDS COMPRISING AMIDE BONDS KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH 1658 §101§102§103§112DP Non-Final OA Pending Apr 14, 2023
17925807 ORTHOGONALLY LINKED MULTIMERIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES ZARA, JANE J 1637 §103§112 Non-Final OA 54d Pending Nov 16, 2022
17923843 LINKER COMPOUNDS ALLEN, SARAH ELIZABETH 1637 §102§103§112 Final Rejection Pending Nov 07, 2022
17922254 MULTIMERIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDES WITH DIVIDED STRANDS ANGELL, JON E 1637 §112 Non-Final OA 69d Pending Oct 28, 2022

Managing Mpeg La L L C's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month