Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mriguidance B V currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. The presence of a single examiner indicates that the company's current prosecution is concentrated under a single point of review, which can simplify communication but also makes the portfolio's progress dependent on that individual's specific examination style.
The busiest examiner is COOMBER, KEVIN M, who is managing the 1 pending office action. This figure is the same as the total workload for the portfolio. With the distinct art unit involved, the company's current legal activity is confined to a specific technical group. Practitioners should monitor this examiner's history within the Communications area to better anticipate potential hurdles, as this case represents the entirety of the company's current office interaction.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOMBER, KEVIN M | 1 | 84.6% | +21.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18780040 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF BODILY TISSUES AND/OR BODILY FLUIDS AND/OR AIR | COOMBER, KEVIN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18780040 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF BODILY TISSUES AND/OR BODILY FLUIDS AND/OR AIR | COOMBER, KEVIN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18780040 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF BODILY TISSUES AND/OR BODILY FLUIDS AND/OR AIR | COOMBER, KEVIN M | 2663 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMriguidance B V has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kevin M Coomber has the most, with 1 of Mriguidance B V's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
