Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Mu Ionic Solutions Corporation has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters are distributed among 6 examiners and 6 art units, showing broad dispersion across the active examining record rather than concentration in one unit.
WEINER, LAURA S is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Because the busiest assignment is limited to that figure, portfolio oversight should emphasize matter-level deadlines, independent claim issues, and unit-specific practice instead of a single examiner relationship.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (67%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEINER, LAURA S | 1 | 85.2% | +14.7% |
| WANG, EUGENIA | 1 | 54.6% | +34.5% |
| IANNUCCI, LOUISE JAMES | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| PILLAY, DEVINA | 1 | 44.4% | +25.5% |
| CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY | 1 | 10.0% | -13.3% |
| LI, AIQUN | 1 | 63.7% | +23.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18397118 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME | WEINER, LAURA S | 30d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17932917 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND ENERGY DEVICE USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE | CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY | 28d overdue |
| 18529463 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE | WANG, EUGENIA | — |
| 18369699 | Non-Aqueous Electrolyte and Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Battery Using Same | IANNUCCI, LOUISE JAMES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18397118 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME | WEINER, LAURA S | 30d overdue |
| 18529463 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE | WANG, EUGENIA | — |
| 18232626 | Nonaqueous Electrolytic Solution and Nonaqueous Electrolytic Solution Battery | PILLAY, DEVINA | — |
| 17837270 | Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution and Energy Device | LI, AIQUN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1723 | 1 |
| 1759 | 1 |
| 1721 | 1 |
| 1726 | 1 |
| 1751 | 1 |
| 1766 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18397118 | NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME | WEINER, LAURA S | 1723 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d overdue | Pending | Dec 27, 2023 |
| 18529463 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE | WANG, EUGENIA | 1759 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 05, 2023 |
| 18369699 | Non-Aqueous Electrolyte and Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Battery Using Same | IANNUCCI, LOUISE JAMES | 1721 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 18, 2023 |
| 18232626 | Nonaqueous Electrolytic Solution and Nonaqueous Electrolytic Solution Battery | PILLAY, DEVINA | 1726 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 10, 2023 |
| 17932917 | NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND ENERGY DEVICE USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE | CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY | 1751 | §102 | Final Rejection | 28d overdue | Pending | Sep 16, 2022 |
| 17837270 | Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution and Energy Device | LI, AIQUN | 1766 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMu Ionic Solutions Corporation has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 6 examiners.
Laura S Weiner has the most, with 1 of Mu Ionic Solutions Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
