Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation has 6 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters involve 6 examiners and 6 art units, indicating that every listed matter follows a distinct examination assignment.

FOX, ALLISON M is the busiest identified examiner, with 1 pending matter. Since no examiner or art unit carries a larger concentration, prosecution planning should emphasize individual claim sets, evidence, and response strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
2
Medium (40%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FOX, ALLISON M 1 71.0% +35.7%
WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH 1 52.7% +35.6%
VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1 40.0% +58.4%
DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE 1 48.1% +45.2%
PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 1 64.9% +19.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE —
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18608371 PLACENTAL TISSUE PARTICULATE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 4d overdue
19183186 MIXTURES OF PLACENTAL PARTICLES, GRAFTS INCLUDING THEM, AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THEM FOX, ALLISON M —
18807214 SHAPED AMALGAMATED CARTILAGE GRAFTS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SAME WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH —
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE —
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1633 1
1612 1
1638 1
1631 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19183186 MIXTURES OF PLACENTAL PARTICLES, GRAFTS INCLUDING THEM, AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THEM FOX, ALLISON M 1633 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
18807214 SHAPED AMALGAMATED CARTILAGE GRAFTS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SAME WERTZ, ASHLEE ELIZABETH 1612 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18608371 PLACENTAL TISSUE PARTICULATE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1638 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2024
18591564 CARTILAGE-DERIVED IMPLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE 1631 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
17728384 TISSUE DERIVED IMPLANTS REHYDRATABLE WHILE DISPOSED WITHIN A DEVICE PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 25, 2022

Managing Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation have?

Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation applications?

Allison M Fox has the most, with 1 of Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month