Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mushlabs GmbH has 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, with each examiner overseeing 1 matter. The workload is spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the pending applications cover different technical niches within the chemistry field and are being reviewed by separate specialized groups.
The busiest examiner is ARIANI, KADE, who handles 1 pending office action. Because the 3 pending office actions are split among 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, there is no central examiner or art unit dominating the current prosecution landscape for this portfolio. This structure means that the company must navigate 3 different examination environments simultaneously. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback across these 3 distinct art units, as the lack of examiner overlap prevents a unified negotiation path for the current Chemistry & Materials filings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARIANI, KADE | 1 | 74.9% | +32.4% |
| MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A | 1 | 20.0% | +17.9% |
| BEISNER, WILLIAM H | 1 | 61.8% | +29.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18114060 | GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS | MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18255420 | PRODUCTION OF FUNGAL BIOMASS | ARIANI, KADE | 17d overdue |
| 18114060 | GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS | MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A | — |
| 18114067 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HARVESTING FUNGAL BIOMASS FROM PLANAR BED | BEISNER, WILLIAM H | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1651 | 1 |
| 1796 | 1 |
| 1799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18255420 | PRODUCTION OF FUNGAL BIOMASS | ARIANI, KADE | 1651 | — | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Jun 01, 2023 |
| 18114060 | GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS | MARCHESCHI, MICHAEL A | 1796 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 24, 2023 |
| 18114067 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HARVESTING FUNGAL BIOMASS FROM PLANAR BED | BEISNER, WILLIAM H | 1799 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial