Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 08, 2026

Mushlabs GmbH

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIU, DEBORAH YANG-HAO 1 7.5% +19.0%
ARIANI, KADE 1 74.8% +32.5%
LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT 1 53.6% +33.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18285555 EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL DAIRY SUBSTITUTE PRODUCT COMPRISING FIBROUS MYCELIUM AS PROTEIN AND INSOLUBLE FIBER COMPONENT AND METHODS OF PRODUCING SUCH LIU, DEBORAH YANG-HAO
18114060 GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18255420 PRODUCTION OF FUNGAL BIOMASS ARIANI, KADE 17d overdue
18285555 EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL DAIRY SUBSTITUTE PRODUCT COMPRISING FIBROUS MYCELIUM AS PROTEIN AND INSOLUBLE FIBER COMPONENT AND METHODS OF PRODUCING SUCH LIU, DEBORAH YANG-HAO
18114060 GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 1
1651 1
1796 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18285555 EDIBLE NON-ANIMAL DAIRY SUBSTITUTE PRODUCT COMPRISING FIBROUS MYCELIUM AS PROTEIN AND INSOLUBLE FIBER COMPONENT AND METHODS OF PRODUCING SUCH LIU, DEBORAH YANG-HAO 1791 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 04, 2023
18255420 PRODUCTION OF FUNGAL BIOMASS ARIANI, KADE 1651 Final Rejection 17d overdue Pending Jun 01, 2023
18114060 GROWTH SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUNGAL BIOMASS LEPAGE, JONATHAN EVERETT 1796 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 24, 2023

Managing Mushlabs GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month