Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Musyfy Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is under the review of 1 distinct examiner, BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE. The portfolio's activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical field for the pending application. Having 1 pending office action means the company's immediate patent office interactions are limited to a single case.
The busiest examiner, BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE, is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This single action represents the total pending workload of 1 pending office action for the company. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interactions with this specific individual. The presence of 1 distinct art unit further simplifies the administrative landscape for this portfolio. Practitioners should tailor their arguments specifically to the history and preferences of BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE. This centralized structure in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area allows for a very targeted approach to securing patent rights.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 1 | 22.6% | +26.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19028962 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANNING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 2d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19028962 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANNING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19028962 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PLANNING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial