Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mymedvita Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being handled by a distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit. The narrow distribution of pending matters suggests a highly focused prosecution effort at this stage of the company's patent portfolio development.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is NEWTON, CHAD A, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This individual represents the entirety of the company's current examiner interactions at the patent office. Because there is only a single examiner and art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is centralized, requiring coordination with only a specific technical group.
Practitioners should note that the pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area defines the current workload. With NEWTON, CHAD A as the sole examiner, the outcome of this specific matter will significantly impact the company's immediate patent goals. The concentration of activity indicates that the technology being pursued is currently confined to a specific technical classification.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEWTON, CHAD A | 1 | 37.6% | +23.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19025685 | HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | NEWTON, CHAD A | 25d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19025685 | HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | NEWTON, CHAD A | 25d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19025685 | HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | NEWTON, CHAD A | 3681 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 25d overdue | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial