Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Mytra Inc. is currently dealing with 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 pending office action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a focused prosecution effort for the company at this time. For a practitioner, this means that the current patent strategy for the company rests on the interactions with 1 distinct examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is COOK, WILLIAM J, who has 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the entire active workload, the applicant can concentrate all prosecution resources on this specific examiner. This environment simplifies the management of the company's intellectual property assets. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit allows for a targeted approach to overcoming any objections raised by COOK, WILLIAM J within the 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOK, WILLIAM J | 1 | 86.2% | +11.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19219875 | DISCRETE ROLLER ASSEMBLY-BASED HELICAL DRIVE FOR TRANSLATION | COOK, WILLIAM J | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19219875 | DISCRETE ROLLER ASSEMBLY-BASED HELICAL DRIVE FOR TRANSLATION | COOK, WILLIAM J | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19219875 | DISCRETE ROLLER ASSEMBLY-BASED HELICAL DRIVE FOR TRANSLATION | COOK, WILLIAM J | 3618 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial