Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nabla Mobility Inc. has a focused prosecution profile with 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio into a single point of contact simplifies the administrative burden of tracking deadlines or varying examiner styles. LEWANDROSKI, SARA J is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action.
Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's current patent strategy in this technology area depends entirely on the interactions within this specific unit. Practitioners can focus their resources on the specific requirements of LEWANDROSKI, SARA J, as there are no other pending actions to balance or compare against within the portfolio. This 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current engagement with the patent office in this specific technology area, allowing for a highly targeted approach to prosecution. The alignment of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the strategy is not diluted by varying administrative standards.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | 1 | 81.0% | +9.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18724602 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3661 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18724602 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | LEWANDROSKI, SARA J | 3661 | §101§102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Jun 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial