Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Naieel Technology Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in Chemistry & Materials. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in a single art unit. FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with a workload matching the total pending count. The concentration of the portfolio under a sole examiner suggests a highly focused prosecution effort at this stage.
With only a single pending matter, the company's interaction with the USPTO is confined to a single technical group. The presence of the busiest examiner means this individual is responsible for the entirety of the company's pending workload. This parity between actions and examiners indicates that there is no current overlap or conflicting examiner styles to navigate. Practitioners should note that the specific art unit involved will define the primary examination criteria for the portfolio.
Because the portfolio is small, the prosecution strategy is highly centralized. FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH has a workload that represents the total volume of pending work for Naieel Technology Inc. This focus in Chemistry & Materials allows for a direct approach to addressing any rejections. The practitioner can concentrate on the specific tendencies of the assigned official without needing to reconcile different behaviors across multiple groups.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | 1 | 73.6% | +24.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18649042 | LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18649042 | LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1728 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18649042 | LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH | 1728 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNaieel Technology Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Adam Joseph Francis has the most, with 1 of Naieel Technology Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
