Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Nano Composite Products Inc. operates a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. This 1 action is being reviewed in 1 distinct art unit, which covers the company's mechanical innovations. Prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner.
Jonathan Angelo Dicuia is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 action represents the total pending workload for the company at the patent office. The focus on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering indicates that the filings likely involve structural designs or mechanical systems.
Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific technical standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved. With only 1 pending office action, the prosecution process is highly centralized. The involvement of Jonathan Angelo Dicuia as the sole examiner provides a clear and direct point of contact for resolving the outstanding matter in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 1 | 52.9% | +48.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698619 | IMPACT APPARATUS WITH REAL-TIME FEEDBACK | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 23d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698619 | IMPACT APPARATUS WITH REAL-TIME FEEDBACK | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 23d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18698619 | IMPACT APPARATUS WITH REAL-TIME FEEDBACK | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 3784 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial