Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nanofiber Quantum Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nanofiber Quantum Technologies Inc. maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter represents the company's current focus within this technical sector at the patent office. The presence of a pending action suggests a targeted prosecution strategy for the company's chemistry-related intellectual property.

The portfolio currently interacts with 1 distinct examiner and a specific art unit. This alignment indicates that the company's pending applications are being reviewed within a narrow technical classification. Christopher Paul Daigler is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the pending office action. Because all active prosecution is consolidated under this individual, the process is highly centralized.

For practitioners, this concentration means that the outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends significantly on the examination style of Christopher Paul Daigler. The lack of distribution across multiple art units or examiners simplifies the coordination of prosecution but also limits the variety of examiner perspectives. Future filings in the Chemistry & Materials area may continue to be assigned to this specific art unit if they share similar technical features.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAIGLER, CHRISTOPHER PAUL 1 55.0% +25.3%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18609660 METHOD OF NANOFIBER FABRICATION WITH A DEUTERIUM OR TRITIUM FLAME DAIGLER, CHRISTOPHER PAUL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1741 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18609660 METHOD OF NANOFIBER FABRICATION WITH A DEUTERIUM OR TRITIUM FLAME DAIGLER, CHRISTOPHER PAUL 1741 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 19, 2024

Managing Nanofiber Quantum Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month