Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nanoform Finland PLC is currently prosecuting 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a specific and singular technical focus for the company's active filings. The prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner, providing a consistent point of contact for the company's legal team. For a practitioner, this indicates that the legal strategy can be narrowly tailored to the specific examination standards of this technical division.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ROBINSON, RENEE E, who holds the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since the company has only 1 distinct examiner for its active matters, the outcome of the current prosecution cycle is tied to the review of this single official. The focus within 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technology being patented is specialized and does not currently cross into other chemical or material classifications. This centralized prosecution profile minimizes the complexity often found in larger portfolios that span multiple art units and examiners, allowing for a highly targeted patenting strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON, RENEE E | 1 | 73.6% | +24.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18372027 | SYSTEM, APPARATUSES, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING PARTICLES | ROBINSON, RENEE E | 8d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18372027 | SYSTEM, APPARATUSES, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING PARTICLES | ROBINSON, RENEE E | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1772 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18372027 | SYSTEM, APPARATUSES, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING PARTICLES | ROBINSON, RENEE E | 1772 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial