Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nanospot AI Inc. maintains a patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Currently, the portfolio has 1 pending office action, which is the only active item in their prosecution pipeline. This 1 pending office action is assigned to TURK, NEIL N, who is identified as the busiest examiner for the company. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company's current progress in the Chemistry & Materials field is tied directly to the decisions made by this examiner.
The portfolio exhibits a high degree of specialization, as it involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's innovations are likely concentrated in a specific sub-sector that falls under a single administrative umbrella at the USPTO. Working with 1 distinct art unit means the applicant only needs to navigate the specific practices of one group. Furthermore, the presence of 1 distinct examiner suggests a streamlined prosecution process without the complexity of managing different examiner styles. This 1 pending office action represents the total current workload, allowing for a concentrated effort on securing these specific patent rights.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TURK, NEIL N | 1 | 51.0% | +44.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17813003 | TEST CARD FOR AGGLUTINATION ASSAY TO BE ASSESSED WITH COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED IMAGE ANALYSIS | TURK, NEIL N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17813003 | TEST CARD FOR AGGLUTINATION ASSAY TO BE ASSESSED WITH COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED IMAGE ANALYSIS | TURK, NEIL N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1798 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17813003 | TEST CARD FOR AGGLUTINATION ASSAY TO BE ASSESSED WITH COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED IMAGE ANALYSIS | TURK, NEIL N | 1798 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial