Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nansen Pty Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M, and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M, is responsible for the 1 pending office action, which represents the company's entire current pending workload. The concentration of the 1 pending office action in 1 distinct art unit indicates a narrow focus within the computing and software field.
Practitioners must focus on the specific requirements of this art unit and the individual preferences of ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's current patent prosecution success depends entirely on the outcome of this single case. There are no other pending actions to provide a broader view of how the Computing & Software group evaluates the company's innovations. The relationship between the examiner and the 1 pending office action means that the entire prosecution strategy is centered on the interaction with ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M. For a practitioner, the success of the 1 pending office action requires a focused approach that addresses the specific technical standards of the 1 distinct art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | 1 | 84.1% | +2.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18992047 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING RESPONSIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE IMMUTABILITY AND DATA INTEGRITY VALIDATION IN CLOUD AND DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SMART CONTRACT TECHNOLOGY | ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2164 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18992047 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING RESPONSIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE IMMUTABILITY AND DATA INTEGRITY VALIDATION IN CLOUD AND DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SMART CONTRACT TECHNOLOGY | ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | 2164 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNansen Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Belix M Ortiz Ditren has the most, with 1 of Nansen Pty Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
