Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Nantes Université is currently overseeing 2 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating that each pending matter is being handled independently within the patent office. The busiest examiner, DENT, ALANA HARRIS, is assigned 1 pending office action. Because the total number of pending actions is 2 and there are 2 examiners, the workload is distributed with 1 action per examiner.
The involvement of 2 distinct art units for 2 pending actions suggests that the university's research in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals covers different specialized classifications. This structure requires the company to manage 2 separate prosecution tracks, each with its own examiner and administrative unit. Such a decentralized approach means that the outcome of 1 pending action is unlikely to directly influence the other. Practitioners can benefit from this variety, as it provides multiple points of engagement with the patent office for their current pharmaceutical and biotechnological filings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DENT, ALANA HARRIS | 1 | 44.2% | +32.0% |
| CHO, DAVID H | 1 | 31.9% | +67.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17927941 | ANTIFUNGAL PRODRUGS | CHO, DAVID H | 42d overdue |
| 18555093 | NEW METHOD TO IMPROVE THE ANTI-TUMORAL ACTIVITY OF MACROPHAGES | DENT, ALANA HARRIS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1643 | 1 |
| 1693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18555093 | NEW METHOD TO IMPROVE THE ANTI-TUMORAL ACTIVITY OF MACROPHAGES | DENT, ALANA HARRIS | 1643 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 12, 2023 |
| 17927941 | ANTIFUNGAL PRODRUGS | CHO, DAVID H | 1693 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d overdue | Pending | Nov 28, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial