Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Naox Technologies has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit.
The portfolio's current activity is concentrated, with the pending action being reviewed by a single examiner in a single art unit. This indicates the current focus of the company's interactions with the patent office. Having 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit shows the technical classification of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology being pursued. The 1 pending office action assigned to CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY represents the current pending workload. This structure results in a focused prosecution strategy within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. The examiner and art unit assignments provide a specific point of contact for the company's current patent office engagement.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | 1 | 31.7% | +30.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18785019 | DEVICE FOR DETECTING BRAIN ACTIVITY OF A MAMMAL AND ASSOCIATED METHOD | CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18785019 | DEVICE FOR DETECTING BRAIN ACTIVITY OF A MAMMAL AND ASSOCIATED METHOD | CATINA, MICHAEL ANTHONY | 3791 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNaox Technologies has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Michael Anthony Catina has the most, with 1 of Naox Technologies's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
