Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nasdaq Technology AB

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nasdaq Technology AB is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These 3 actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, meaning that each case is receiving an independent review. This distribution across 3 examiners suggests that the company's success in the patent office is spread across multiple individual perspectives.

The company's prosecution effort is also split among 3 distinct art units, which matches the number of pending actions and examiners. This indicates that each of the 3 pending office actions is being processed in a different specialized group. Managing 3 art units requires the company to adapt to the specific technical and procedural expectations of 3 different administrative bodies within the patent office.

XIAO, DI is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. This 1 action is 1 of the 3 total pending office actions, showing that the workload is evenly distributed. The alignment of 3 examiners and 3 art units for 3 actions points to a prosecution landscape where each software related application is being handled as a distinct matter by separate personnel.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
XIAO, DI 1 77.7% +21.6%
TRUONG, LECHI 1 87.2% +36.7%
ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 1 61.2% +21.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18203732 GENERATING EXTREME BUT PLAUSIBLE SYSTEM RESPONSE SCENARIOS USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 2d overdue
18824689 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING ENTITY-LEVEL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES XIAO, DI —
18810887 PUBLISH-SUBSCRIBE FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION EXECUTION TRUONG, LECHI —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18203732 GENERATING EXTREME BUT PLAUSIBLE SYSTEM RESPONSE SCENARIOS USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 2d overdue
18824689 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING ENTITY-LEVEL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES XIAO, DI —
18810887 PUBLISH-SUBSCRIBE FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION EXECUTION TRUONG, LECHI —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2178 1
2194 1
2129 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18824689 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING ENTITY-LEVEL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES XIAO, DI 2178 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2024
18810887 PUBLISH-SUBSCRIBE FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION EXECUTION TRUONG, LECHI 2194 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2024
18203732 GENERATING EXTREME BUT PLAUSIBLE SYSTEM RESPONSE SCENARIOS USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ALABI, OLUWATOSIN O 2129 §103§112 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending May 31, 2023

Managing Nasdaq Technology AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Nasdaq Technology AB have?

Nasdaq Technology AB has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Nasdaq Technology AB applications?

Di Xiao has the most, with 1 of Nasdaq Technology AB's pending office actions.

What technology area are Nasdaq Technology AB's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month