Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
National Agricultural Research Organization is managing 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ORDAZ, CHRISTIAN JOSE. The portfolio involves 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the company's active matter is being reviewed within a specific technical division of the patent office. This concentration allows for a prosecution strategy that is highly specialized for the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector and the requirements of that single art unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ORDAZ, CHRISTIAN JOSE, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner handles the company's entire current workload. Practitioners should focus on the examiner's specific history and the technical standards of the art unit to anticipate the outcome of this matter. The singular nature of the current prosecution means that the company's immediate success in this area depends on the feedback and decisions of this one official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORDAZ, CHRISTIAN JOSE | 1 | 61.1% | +91.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18773683 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MANAGEMENT OF WHITEFLY | ORDAZ, CHRISTIAN JOSE | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18773683 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MANAGEMENT OF WHITEFLY | ORDAZ, CHRISTIAN JOSE | 1663 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Jul 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial