Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

National University Corporation Okayama University

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

National University Corporation Okayama University manages 5 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 5 pending office actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, providing a broad range of examiner interactions. The matters are spread across 4 distinct art units, indicating a diverse research portfolio within the biotech sector. GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A is the busiest examiner, though he only handles 1 pending office action. This distribution suggests a highly specialized approach to patenting.

This distribution of 5 pending office actions among 5 distinct examiners suggests that the university's patent applications are highly specialized and rarely overlap under the same examiner. The 4 distinct art units involved further highlight the breadth of their work in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A is responsible for 1 pending office action, reflecting the individualized nature of the prosecution. Practitioners must navigate 4 distinct art units to manage the 5 pending office actions effectively across the university's diverse research interests.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only3 (60%)
§102 only1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A 1 76.0% +12.4%
LAWLER, JOHN VINCENT 1 57.4% +43.0%
VAN, QUANG T 1 74.2% +8.3%
HADDAD, MAHER M 1 50.4% +53.9%
TAKENAKA, RISA 1 27.3% +100.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17761518 LBM, CPC, OPC, PRODUCTION AND QUALITY CONTROL METHODS THEREFOR, KIT, GRAFT MATERIAL, AND DISEASE MODEL TAKENAKA, RISA 67d overdue

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17761518 LBM, CPC, OPC, PRODUCTION AND QUALITY CONTROL METHODS THEREFOR, KIT, GRAFT MATERIAL, AND DISEASE MODEL TAKENAKA, RISA 67d overdue
18811900 STATOR GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A —
18712729 METHOD FOR BONDING POLYIMIDE FILM, BONDING DEVICE, AND BONDED STRUCTURE HAVING POLYIMIDE FILM BONDING PART LAWLER, JOHN VINCENT —
17768865 PROPHYLACTIC AND/OR THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR INFLAMMATORY PULMONARY DISEASE HADDAD, MAHER M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2834 1
1787 1
1641 1
1632 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18811900 STATOR GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A 2834 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18712729 METHOD FOR BONDING POLYIMIDE FILM, BONDING DEVICE, AND BONDED STRUCTURE HAVING POLYIMIDE FILM BONDING PART LAWLER, JOHN VINCENT 1787 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2024
18419870 INDUCTION HEATING COIL UNIT AND INDUCTION HEATING DEVICE VAN, QUANG T — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2024
17768865 PROPHYLACTIC AND/OR THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR INFLAMMATORY PULMONARY DISEASE HADDAD, MAHER M 1641 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2022
17761518 LBM, CPC, OPC, PRODUCTION AND QUALITY CONTROL METHODS THEREFOR, KIT, GRAFT MATERIAL, AND DISEASE MODEL TAKENAKA, RISA 1632 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 67d overdue Pending Mar 17, 2022

Managing National University Corporation Okayama University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month