Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Navenio Ltd. manages a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Currently, the portfolio has 1 pending office action. This action represents the current level of active engagement with the patent office for the company's mechanical and e-commerce filings. For a practitioner, this indicates a focused prosecution stage where a single application is the primary administrative priority.
The filings are being reviewed by a distinct examiner across a single art unit. This suggests that the company's innovations are being evaluated through a single administrative channel at the USPTO. FLYNN, ABBY J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The use of a single art unit ensures that the company's mechanical and e-commerce technologies are evaluated against a consistent set of prior art and examination standards.
FLYNN, ABBY J is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only a single pending action overall, the review by FLYNN, ABBY J is the sole focus of the company's current patenting activity. Practitioners should tailor their strategy to the specific requirements of FLYNN, ABBY J and the art unit involved to advance the pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLYNN, ABBY J | 1 | 33.0% | +55.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18006069 | MAP MATCHING TRAJECTORIES | FLYNN, ABBY J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18006069 | MAP MATCHING TRAJECTORIES | FLYNN, ABBY J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18006069 | MAP MATCHING TRAJECTORIES | FLYNN, ABBY J | 3663 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial