Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Nayax Ltd. is currently handling 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These cases are assigned to 2 distinct examiners but are both located within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the applications share a very similar technical classification. Practitioners can benefit from the consistent procedural guidelines provided by the 1 distinct art unit.
BUNKER, WILLIAM B is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners each reviewing 1 pending office action, the company receives different perspectives within the same administrative division. The 1 distinct art unit provides a unified set of examination standards for both of the 2 pending office actions. Practitioners should apply a consistent strategy across the portfolio while addressing the specific concerns of each examiner. This structure allows for streamlined management of the 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUNKER, WILLIAM B | 1 | 79.8% | +94.4% |
| POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 1 | 11.0% | +12.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18862654 | SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 8d |
| 19247121 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES | BUNKER, WILLIAM B | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18862654 | SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 8d |
| 19247121 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES | BUNKER, WILLIAM B | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3691 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19247121 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENTS WITH SECURITIES | BUNKER, WILLIAM B | 3691 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2025 |
| 18862654 | SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VERIFYING PAYMENT VALIDITY | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 3691 | §101 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Nov 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNayax Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
William B Bunker has the most, with 1 of Nayax Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
