Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Neocis Inc. currently manages a company patent portfolio focused on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio shows a concentrated prosecution footprint with 1 pending office action assigned to a distinct examiner. This examiner, EMMETT, MADISON B, is responsible for the active matter currently in the system.
The concentration of work within 1 distinct art unit suggests a narrow technical focus for the pending application. Because EMMETT, MADISON B is the busiest examiner, the prosecution strategy relies on the tendencies of this specific individual. Practitioners should review the examiner's history within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems space to anticipate potential hurdles.
The presence of the pending office action across the portfolio indicates the current level of active conflict with the patent office. With a distinct art unit involved, the legal team can focus its resources on a specific set of examination guidelines. The fact that the busiest examiner holds the busiest examiner pending count of 1 means that the outcome of this case will define the current success rate for the portfolio.
Reviewing the examiner's past behavior in this technology area can provide a roadmap for successful prosecution. Effective communication with the assigned examiner is essential to clarify technical nuances and reach a favorable outcome. Monitoring the status of the pending office action is vital for timely adjustments to the broader intellectual property strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMMETT, MADISON B | 1 | 80.3% | +9.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692460 | DENTAL IMAGING SYSTEM, AND DENTAL ROBOT SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME | EMMETT, MADISON B | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3658 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18692460 | DENTAL IMAGING SYSTEM, AND DENTAL ROBOT SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME | EMMETT, MADISON B | 3658 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNeocis Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Madison B Emmett has the most, with 1 of Neocis Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
