Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Netradyne Inc. is active in the Communications technology area. The company currently has 4 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating some concentration of the portfolio's technical subject matter. The 2 distinct art units suggest that the 4 pending office actions are being reviewed by two specialized groups at the patent office.
The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners. POPE, DARYL C is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 4 distinct examiners for 4 pending office actions, each examiner is currently managing exactly one active matter for the company. This one-to-one ratio ensures a decentralized examination process where each action is being handled by a different individual.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M | 1 | 89.7% | +7.8% |
| POPE, DARYL C | 1 | 85.5% | +6.4% |
| ALHARBI, ADAM MOHAMED | 1 | 87.8% | +3.8% |
| STREGE, JOHN B | 1 | 87.0% | +13.8% |
| BUTLER, MICHAEL E | 1 | 51.3% | +21.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18899890 | DETERMINING CAUSATION OF TRAFFIC EVENTS AND ENCOURAGING GOOD DRIVING BEHAVIOR | ALHARBI, ADAM MOHAMED | — |
| 18822123 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING INTERSECTION CROSSING EVENTS USING FULL FRAME CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES | STREGE, JOHN B | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19471585 | GENERATIVE DRIVING MODEL | BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M | — |
| 19048076 | COACHABLE DRIVER RISK GROUPS | POPE, DARYL C | — |
| 18763856 | VISUAL LOGIN | BUTLER, MICHAEL E | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18822123 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING INTERSECTION CROSSING EVENTS USING FULL FRAME CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES | STREGE, JOHN B | — |
| 18763856 | VISUAL LOGIN | BUTLER, MICHAEL E | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3665 | 1 |
| 2686 | 1 |
| 3663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19471585 | GENERATIVE DRIVING MODEL | BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M | 3665 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2025 |
| 19048076 | COACHABLE DRIVER RISK GROUPS | POPE, DARYL C | 2686 | §101§102§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 07, 2025 |
| 18899890 | DETERMINING CAUSATION OF TRAFFIC EVENTS AND ENCOURAGING GOOD DRIVING BEHAVIOR | ALHARBI, ADAM MOHAMED | 3663 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 27, 2024 |
| 18822123 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING INTERSECTION CROSSING EVENTS USING FULL FRAME CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES | STREGE, JOHN B | — | §102DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 31, 2024 |
| 18763856 | VISUAL LOGIN | BUTLER, MICHAEL E | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial