Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Neural Concept SA

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Neural Concept SA currently has 1 pending office action under review. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, representing the full extent of the company's current active prosecution. The limited number of actions suggests a highly targeted patenting effort. This focused activity requires direct engagement with the assigned personnel.

KIM, EUNHEE is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. Since this is the only 1 pending office action in the portfolio, the company's immediate progress depends on the interaction with this specific examiner. Practitioners should prepare for the requirements of this individual to resolve the pending matter efficiently.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIM, EUNHEE 1 77.4% +12.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270835 DIFFERENTIABLE PARAMETRIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED DESIGN SOLUTION KIM, EUNHEE —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270835 DIFFERENTIABLE PARAMETRIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED DESIGN SOLUTION KIM, EUNHEE —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18270835 DIFFERENTIABLE PARAMETRIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED DESIGN SOLUTION KIM, EUNHEE — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2023

Managing Neural Concept SA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month