Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Neuravision S R L currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which represents a focused prosecution profile. The company's current engagement with the patent office is concentrated on this specific application and its assigned reviewer.
The matter is being processed within a distinct art unit. This indicates that the technological scope of the company's current pending work is confined to a specific administrative division. Navigating this environment involves addressing the specific examination standards and timelines of that particular group. The applicant must tailor its responses to the expectations of this specialized unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K, who is responsible for the pending matter. Since there is only the active action in the entire portfolio, this examiner oversees the totality of the company's current active prosecution. This centralization means that the company's immediate patent outcomes are tied to the review of this official, requiring a precise and targeted legal approach.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | 1 | 72.9% | +18.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875478 | PLANT FOR CLASSIFICATION AND SELECTION OF OBJECTS COMPRISING PRECIOUS METALS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18875478 | PLANT FOR CLASSIFICATION AND SELECTION OF OBJECTS COMPRISING PRECIOUS METALS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18875478 | PLANT FOR CLASSIFICATION AND SELECTION OF OBJECTS COMPRISING PRECIOUS METALS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K | 3653 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNeuravision S R L has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kalyanavenka K Kumar has the most, with 1 of Neuravision S R L's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
