Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Neurescue Aps is currently engaged in patent prosecution for its medical device portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio data indicates 1 pending office action. This single pending action is the current focus for the company as it seeks to secure its intellectual property rights. In the medical device sector, 1 pending office action often involves detailed technical discussions regarding the safety and novelty of the mechanical systems involved.
The examination process is centralized, with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit assigned to the portfolio. This ensures that the technical review is consistent and handled by a specialized examiner. OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE is the busiest examiner for this company, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the entirety of the company's active prosecution workload, as there is only 1 pending office action in total.
Practitioners can benefit from the stability provided by 1 distinct art unit during the prosecution of the 1 pending office action. Because OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE is the sole examiner involved, the legal strategy can be specifically designed to address her technical concerns and examination patterns. Successfully navigating the 1 pending office action with this single examiner is the key to advancing the company's position in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE | 1 | 16.7% | +83.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18699925 | Mountable device for autonomous blood vessel interfacing and instrument actuation | OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE | 8d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18699925 | Mountable device for autonomous blood vessel interfacing and instrument actuation | OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18699925 | Mountable device for autonomous blood vessel interfacing and instrument actuation | OKONAK, ELIZABETH LOUISE | 3792 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial