Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Neurochase Technologies Limited is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution is overseen by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the firm's current patent office interactions. Such a structure allows for a highly focused approach to the pending matter, as the applicant only needs to address the specific legal and technical interpretations of a single official. The administrative complexity of the portfolio is low, given that only 1 pending office action is active at this time.
The pending application is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical classification for the company's current intellectual property efforts. SHAH, NILAY J is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently managing the 1 pending office action. As this individual is the only examiner involved in the company's active workload, their specific feedback will be the primary factor in the immediate outcome of the prosecution. There are no other examiners or art units currently involved in the firm's pending matters.
The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner suggests a targeted strategy. Practitioners can dedicate their efforts to understanding the specific examination style of SHAH, NILAY J, who holds the 1 pending office action that constitutes the active pipeline. This focused environment minimizes the risk of conflicting requirements from different examiners while the company operates within its 1 distinct art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAH, NILAY J | 1 | 76.3% | +46.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288676 | VARIABLE DOSE THERAPEUTIC AGENT DISPENSER | SHAH, NILAY J | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18288676 | VARIABLE DOSE THERAPEUTIC AGENT DISPENSER | SHAH, NILAY J | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialNeurochase Technologies Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Nilay J Shah has the most, with 1 of Neurochase Technologies Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
