Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Neurogeneces Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split across distinct examiners and distinct art units, with each of those categories totaling 2. This distribution indicates that the company's current patent filings are being reviewed by different technical groups within the USPTO, rather than being concentrated in a single specialized unit.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is RUMAISA RASHID BAIG, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given the total workload, the actions are evenly distributed, with each examiner managing a single action apiece. This lack of concentration means that the company must navigate the specific requirements and tendencies of multiple technical units simultaneously. The 1 busiest examiner pending action represents a key point of contact for the company's legal strategy.
For a portfolio of this size, having multiple examiners across various art units for the active filings suggests a range of applications within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Practitioners must tailor their responses to the specific standards of each unit involved to ensure successful prosecution across the entire active portfolio. Understanding the individual preferences of RUMAISA RASHID BAIG and the other assigned examiner is essential for moving these 2 pending office actions toward allowance.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 1 | 34.0% | +33.2% |
| MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | 1 | 52.7% | +35.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19058751 | SENSING SYSTEM WITH FEATURES FOR DETERMINING AND ENHANCING COGNITIVE RESERVE OF A SUBJECT | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | — |
| 18742949 | SENSING SYSTEM WITH FEATURES FOR DETERMINING AND PREDICTING BRAIN AGE AND OTHER ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL METRICS OF A SUBJECT | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19058751 | SENSING SYSTEM WITH FEATURES FOR DETERMINING AND ENHANCING COGNITIVE RESERVE OF A SUBJECT | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 3796 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 20, 2025 |
| 18742949 | SENSING SYSTEM WITH FEATURES FOR DETERMINING AND PREDICTING BRAIN AGE AND OTHER ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL METRICS OF A SUBJECT | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | 3791 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial