Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

Neurointact Inc.

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 1 0.0% +0.0%
OUYANG, BO 1 60.8% +8.9%
DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 1 74.4% +26.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18652593 NASAL CANNULA TEMPERATURE CONTROL OUYANG, BO 7d
18334728 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING THE BRAIN OF A HUMAN SUBJECT DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 9d
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18334728 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING THE BRAIN OF A HUMAN SUBJECT DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 9d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3794 2
3785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18652653 TEMPERATURE REGULATED FLUID THERAPY GANAN-SINGH, CHRISTINA MERAIAH 3794 §103 Non-Final OA Pending May 01, 2024
18652593 NASAL CANNULA TEMPERATURE CONTROL OUYANG, BO 3794 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending May 01, 2024
18334728 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING THE BRAIN OF A HUMAN SUBJECT DIXON, ANNETTE FREDRICKA 3785 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 9d Pending Jun 14, 2023

Managing Neurointact Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month